Friday, October 31, 2008
A List Of Socialist Countries For Those So Inclined
Soap Box Ravings' asks, "On a scale of socialists where does this one fit?"
This is a list of countries, past and present, that declared themselves socialist either in their names or their constitutions. No other criteria are used; thus, some or all of these countries may not fit any specific definition of socialism. Their only common feature is using the label "socialist" for themselves, under any interpretation. There are few, if any, definitions of socialism that could fit all the countries on this list. However, most definitions of socialism fit at least some of these countries at some points in their histories.
There are many countries that have been ruled by socialist political parties for extended periods of time without ever adopting socialism as an official ideology in their names or constitutions. Such countries are not listed here. However, see the article on the Socialist International for an up-to-date list of countries that are currently ruled by member parties of the SI (the largest present day organization of socialist political parties).
Conversely, there are some countries that maintain constitutional references to socialism without being currently ruled by a socialist political party. Those countries are included on this list.
Marxist-Leninist:
These countries are known as "Communist states" in the West, because their ruling parties generally use the name "Communist Party of [country]." However, the countries themselves are referred to as socialist republics, not communist, in their own constitutions. They are defined by a form of government in which the state operates under a one-party system and declares allegiance to the ideology of Marxism-Leninism. In accordance with Marxism-Leninism, the constitutions of these countries claim that all power belongs to the working class, that a democratic dictatorship of the proletariat has been implemented within their borders, and that they are building socialism, with the goal of achieving communism one day.
Current:
Republic of Mozambique
North Korea - Democratic People's Republic of Korea
China - People's Republic of China
Cuba - Republic of Cuba
Laos - Lao People's Democratic Republic
Vietnam - Socialist Republic of Vietnam
Cyprus - Republic of Cyprus
Moldova - Republic of Moldova
Nepal - Republic of Nepal
Republic of Angola
Former:
Democratic Republic of Afghanistan
People's Socialist Republic of Albania
People's Republic of Angola
People's Republic of Benin
People's Republic of the Congo
Republic of Czechoslovakia
Czechoslovak Socialist Republic
People's Democratic Republic of Ethiopia
Finnish Democratic Republic
German Democratic Republic
Political Committee of National Liberation (Greece)
People's Revolutionary Government of Grenada
People's Republic of Hungary
Hungarian Soviet Republic
Democratic Kampuchea
People's Republic of Kampuchea
Mongolian People's Republic
People's Republic of Mozambique
People's Republic of Poland
People's Republic of Romania
Socialist Republic of Romania
Somali Democratic Republic
Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
Tuvinian People's Republic
Democratic Republic of Vietnam
People's Democratic Republic of Yemen
Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia
Socialist and Leftwing:
These are countries whose constitutions make references to socialism, but do not subscribe to Marxist-Leninist ideology. As such, they represent a wide variety of different interpretations of the term socialism.
Current:
Republic of Nicaragua
People's Republic of Bangladesh
Arab Republic of Egypt
Cooperative Republic of Guyana
Republic of India
Great Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
Portuguese Republic
Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka
Syrian Arab Republic
United Republic of Tanzania
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
Republic of Bolivia
People's Democratic Republic of Algeria
Democratic Republic of Madagascar
Republic of Bulgaria
Republic of Chile
Republic of Ecuador
Republic of Costa Rica
State of Eritrea
Oriental Republic of Uruguay
Former:
People's Democratic Republic of Algeria
Republic of Bolivia
Burkina Faso
Socialist Republic of the Union of Burma
Republic of Cape Verde
Republic of Ghana
Republic of Guinea
Republic of Guinea-Bissau
Republic of Indonesia
Republic of Iraq
Democratic Republic of Madagascar
Republic of Mali
Republic of Nicaragua
Democratic Republic of São Tomé and PrÃncipe
Republic of Senegal
Republic of Seychelles
Democratic Republic of Sudan
Republic of Suriname
Tunisian Republic
Republic of Uganda
Former states:
Socialist Republic of Chile (República Socialista de Chile)
United Arab Republic (now Syrian Arab Republic and Egyptian Arab Republic)
People's Republic of Zanzibar (now part of Tanzania)
Ephemeral:
These are short-lived political entities that emerged during wars or revolutions (mostly in the aftermath of World War I) and declared themselves to be socialist under some interpretation of the term, but did not survive long enough to create a stable government or achieve international recognition.
Alsace Soviet Republic
Azerbaijan People's Government
Bavarian Soviet Republic
Bessarabian Soviet Socialist Republic
Bukharan People's Soviet Republic
Donetsk-Krivoy Rog Soviet Republic
Asturian Socialist Republic
Estonian Workers' Commune
Far Eastern Republic
Finnish Socialist Workers' Republic
Galician Soviet Socialist Republic
German Socialist Republic
Hunan Soviet
Chinese Soviet Republic
Khorazmian People's Soviet Republic
Lithuanian-Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic
Republic of Mahabad
Mughan Soviet Republic
Soviet Republic of Naissaar
Paris Commune
Persian Socialist Soviet Republic
Republic of South Vietnam
Slovak Soviet Republic
Turkestan Socialist Federative Republic
Democratic Republic of Yemen
The complete article with references that this information came from can be found at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_socialist_countries
The flags on the wall of Obama's Houston campaign office are Cuban flags with well known Communist mass murderer Che Guevara's likeness on them.
Soap Box Ravings says when we become a socialist country we will join a long list of other failure countries; past, present and still failing.. But those who do not learn from history are doomed to continually repeat history.
Today Limbaugh reported that some large newspapers had come out in support of John McCain. He also reported that reporters from those newspapers now supporting John McCain were immediately banned henceforth from traveling on Obama One with Barack Hussein Obama. Coupling that report with the TV stations that Obama and Company will no longer allow interviews with; it looks like the media is about to reap the results of what they have sown.
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
Is It A Scam, Or Perhaps Information Mining
This coupon came in a loaf of bread. So I thought, what the heck and went on-line. The site asked me about three questions and then it told me I was not eligible for the survey.
Wrong answer I thought since by responding I had already participated in the survey. So I sent Pepperidge Farm an e-mail pointing out the coupon did not say I would get the $3.00 coupon if I was eligible but that I would get it by participating which I did. Pepperidge Farms said they would mail me a coupon and they did.
About a week later, my sister-in-law took the survey all the way to the last question where she was informed she was not eligible for the coupon. Last I heard she was on the phone looking for someone to explain why she did not rate a coupon.
Soap Box Ravings can not help but wonder what kind of nitwit wrote this survey program. I ran in-house and post graduate surveys for a large Department of Defense school prior to retiring and anyone that responded was included in the survey. The question therefore is this a poorly administrative legitimate survey (in which good and not so good answers should be recorded) or is this a information mining scam looking to get e-mail addresses. Either way it doesn't appear to be helping the good name of Pepperidge Farms.
Wrong answer I thought since by responding I had already participated in the survey. So I sent Pepperidge Farm an e-mail pointing out the coupon did not say I would get the $3.00 coupon if I was eligible but that I would get it by participating which I did. Pepperidge Farms said they would mail me a coupon and they did.
About a week later, my sister-in-law took the survey all the way to the last question where she was informed she was not eligible for the coupon. Last I heard she was on the phone looking for someone to explain why she did not rate a coupon.
Soap Box Ravings can not help but wonder what kind of nitwit wrote this survey program. I ran in-house and post graduate surveys for a large Department of Defense school prior to retiring and anyone that responded was included in the survey. The question therefore is this a poorly administrative legitimate survey (in which good and not so good answers should be recorded) or is this a information mining scam looking to get e-mail addresses. Either way it doesn't appear to be helping the good name of Pepperidge Farms.
Saturday, October 25, 2008
Thursday, October 16, 2008
Justifiable Homicides, My Take
In a recent article, I read that some law enforcement analysts say the increased number of justifiable homicides (the killing of a person during the commission of a felony by a private citizen or by a police officer under the color of law) reflects a shoot-first philosophy in dealing with crime.
These same law enforcement analysts say the numbers represent changing attitudes on the streets where some citizens are taking more responsibility for their own protection and where police have often felt more threatened by better armed offenders.
The complete article may be found at:
http://www.officer.com/web/online/Top-News-Stories/Justifiable-Homicides-at-Highest-in-Decade-/1$43712
Soap Box Ravings is not a law enforcement analyst. But he can not help but wonder what affect the general populations attitude shift towards the law has upon this subject of justifiable homicides. Any police officer can tell you that respect for the law, whether it be traffic law (e.g. stopping for a stop sign or speed limits) or the criminal code, the populations attitude has undergone a major negative shift in respect for the law for the last 40-50 years. And with each new year it seems to shift even more.
With more people committing home invasions and car jackings, etc. it is no wonder there are more justifiable homicides. Soap Box Ravings believes if the number of people committing these crimes decreased, the number of justifiable homicides would also reduce.
From another angle, this sentence was taken directly from the article in question:
"In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court in June carved out a right to individual gun ownership, ruling that the Second Amendment allows citizens to keep guns in their homes for self-defense."
As a point of fact, the US Supreme Court did not "carve out a right to individual gun ownership." That right is provided for by the Second Amendment in the "Bill Of Rights." The Supreme Court only reaffirmed that right.
Soap Box Ravings feels the hand of a liberal in the writing of the article. There are other presentations in the article to prove my point, this was just the most glaring one.
When Soap Box Ravings was on the job, either in the US Navy or with the Police Department, this quality of work (the article) was unacceptable by any of his supervisors.
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
It Seems To Me
This is a picture of the MV Faina presently being held by Somalian pirates. This rusty tub is only noteworthy because it's cargo consists of 33 Russian T-72 tanks plus a collection of other armaments which originated in Ukraine and were bound for the government of Kenya.
Now this ship with it's 20 crew members and cargo sits anchored near the Somali port of Hobyo. The Somali pirates have repeatedly threatened to blow up this ship if ransom is not paid.
Pirates armed with Kalashnikov rifles and rocket launchers and using skiffs mounted with high-powered engines launched from "mother ships" disguised as fishing boats, prowl the waters off the Somali coast looking for prey in the local shipping lanes.
The MV Faina, slow, low-sided and sailing under a Belize flag seemed like a good catch. Normally ships are ransomed for somewhere between .5M and 2M dollars, making a hefty yearly profit for the pirates.
But the ship's Faina's cargo, 33 Russian T-72 tanks and other armaments, set off alarms around the world resulting with the Ukraine and Kenya finding themselves in an arms scandal since the arms are suspected of going to Sudan via Kenya.
On the pirates side they say if they could earn money other ways, such as the fishing they used to do....they would.
Soap Box Ravings can't help but wonder a couple of points:
1. If it costs a minimum of a half million dollars to ransom a ship would it not be cheaper to contract with a company, such as Blackwater Worldwide, to put a security team on board a vessel sailing through troubled waters.
When we look at the picture of the MV Faina, even though the sides are low for a ship, they are a good bit above the pirate skiff tied alongside. Coming over the "gunnel's" under fire is no more glamorous today than it was in Blackbeard's' time.
Even if the ship is attacked by RPGs the security team should be able to respond with enough effect to discourage the pirates. There are a lot more places the missile could hit without doing critical damage than there is for critical damage.
However, once the pirates receive incoming fire, their attitude will probably change somewhat.
2. The pirates claim that they would go back to fishing if they could seems somewhat unbelievable. When you can get from .5M to 2M per ship and you can grab roughly 60 ships per year Soap Box Ravings does not believe that all the fisherman in Somali ever made 30+ million dollars throughout Somali history total.
Now this ship with it's 20 crew members and cargo sits anchored near the Somali port of Hobyo. The Somali pirates have repeatedly threatened to blow up this ship if ransom is not paid.
Pirates armed with Kalashnikov rifles and rocket launchers and using skiffs mounted with high-powered engines launched from "mother ships" disguised as fishing boats, prowl the waters off the Somali coast looking for prey in the local shipping lanes.
The MV Faina, slow, low-sided and sailing under a Belize flag seemed like a good catch. Normally ships are ransomed for somewhere between .5M and 2M dollars, making a hefty yearly profit for the pirates.
But the ship's Faina's cargo, 33 Russian T-72 tanks and other armaments, set off alarms around the world resulting with the Ukraine and Kenya finding themselves in an arms scandal since the arms are suspected of going to Sudan via Kenya.
On the pirates side they say if they could earn money other ways, such as the fishing they used to do....they would.
Soap Box Ravings can't help but wonder a couple of points:
1. If it costs a minimum of a half million dollars to ransom a ship would it not be cheaper to contract with a company, such as Blackwater Worldwide, to put a security team on board a vessel sailing through troubled waters.
When we look at the picture of the MV Faina, even though the sides are low for a ship, they are a good bit above the pirate skiff tied alongside. Coming over the "gunnel's" under fire is no more glamorous today than it was in Blackbeard's' time.
Even if the ship is attacked by RPGs the security team should be able to respond with enough effect to discourage the pirates. There are a lot more places the missile could hit without doing critical damage than there is for critical damage.
However, once the pirates receive incoming fire, their attitude will probably change somewhat.
2. The pirates claim that they would go back to fishing if they could seems somewhat unbelievable. When you can get from .5M to 2M per ship and you can grab roughly 60 ships per year Soap Box Ravings does not believe that all the fisherman in Somali ever made 30+ million dollars throughout Somali history total.
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
It Was Past Time To Go Fat Boy
Richard Cooey, the man who murdered University of Akron students Wendy Offredo and Dawn McCreery 22 years ago was executed today in Ohio. He had claimed his obesity would make his execution by lethal injection inhumane.
Cooey and a co-defendent were convicted of raping and killing Wendy Offredo, 21, and Dawn McCreery, 20, in 1986 while on leave from the US Army. The two men carved the Offredo and McCreery's bodies with a knife after repeatedly raping them and choking and beating them to death.
Soap Box Ravings asks what responsibilities does the State have to the victim(s) of heinous crimes. Did Cooey humanely kill his victims? I think not.
When a person has committed a crime serious enough to call for their execution Soap Box Ravings feels their appeal should be seriously and expeditiously carried out. But Soap Box Ravings also feels that Inmate Cooey should not have been held long enough to gain 70 pounds. Once the review was completed, Cooey should have been executed.
Soap Box Ravings often asks with the bastardization of our criminal system perhaps executions should be banned. Years ago an article in Florida said it cost about 3 million dollars for an appeal and each executed State prisoner had three appeals before they were executed. I am not sure it is worth nine million dollars to execute someone. Perhaps the sentence should be Life Without Parole.
The McCain - Palin Tradition
Soap Box Ravings loves Hank Williams Jr.'s performance of The McCain-Palin Tradition, a take off of his song Family Tradition, which he performed at a McCain-Palin Rally 13 October 2008 in Richmond, VA.
A hearty "Bravo Zulu" Hank for this song.
The words are provided for your pleasure below.
McCain - Palin Tradition
By Hank Williams Jr.
The left wing liberal media have
Always been a real close knit family
But, most of the American People
Don't believe em anyway ya see
Stop and think it over
Before you make your decision
If they smell something wrong
They're gonna come down strong
It's a McCain - Palin tradition
Now this old Union's got problems
That is plain to see
The Democrats bankrupted Fannie Mae N Freddie Mac
Just like one, two, three
The bankers didn't want to make all those bad loans,
But Bill Clinton said you got to
Now they want a bail out, what I'm talking about
Is a Democrat liberal who doo, to me an you
John N Sarah tell ya
Just what they think
And they're not gonna blink
they don't have terrorist friends
to whom there careers are linked
Yes John is his own man
And Sarah fixed Alaska's broken condition
They're gonna do just fine
We're headed for better times
It's a McCain - Palin tradition
I am very proud of our country's name
But no society is perfect And we have had our stains
If I'm down at the coffee shop and
Somebody wants to give our flag friction
We say please move on
We are standing strong
That's an old John McCain tradition
John N Sarah tell ya
Just what they think
And they're not gonna blink
And they're gonna fix this country
Cause they're just like you N ole Hank
Yes John is a maverick
And Sarah fixed Alaska's broken condition
They're gonna do just fine
We're headed for better times
It's a McCain - Palin tradition
Some are bound to tell you I'm
Preaching to the choir
And that is very true
And we are going even higher
Like a mama bear in Idaho
She'll protect your family's condition
If you mess with her cubs
She's gonna take of the gloves
It's an American female tradition
Ya I wanta know Sarah
Why do ya hunt
John why do you fish
How can she be so smart and savvy
Such a hey good - looking dish
Yes John is his own man
And Sarah fixed Alaska's bad condition
Their gonna get it right
We're gonna see the light
It's a McCain-Palin tradition
Until the censors get ahold of it, you can hear this version of The McCain-Palin Tradition on U Tube at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S81brjpteDk
One Bad Apple Screws Everything Up
JOSEPH A. SLOBODZIAN, of the Philadelphia Inquirer reported on 10/13/08 that the Pennsylvania parole freeze was bloating the prison population. Knowledgeable prison folks wonder how the system will hold up without the monthly release of 1,100 parolees.
Pennsylvania Governor Rendell halted paroling state inmates, in response to the killing of Philadelphia Police Officer Patrick McDonald by a paroled felon.
Governor Rendell named John S. Goldkamp, head of Temple University's criminal justice department, to do a top-to-bottom review of how the Board of Probation and Parole decides who gets paroled. The Gov.'s spokesman Chuck Ardo said. "Clearly, the danger posed by an error for a citizen outweighs the impact on the system."
Betty Jean Thompson, of Citizens United for Rehabilitation of Errants (CURE), said she found the wholesale halt to parole illogical: "If a surgeon kills his patient, we don't stop all surgeries."
The complete article can be found at:
http://www.philly.com/inquirer/local/pa/20081013_State_parole_freeze
_bloating_prison_populations.html
Soap Box Ravings says if a surgeon kills his patient perhaps we should stop all of the surgeons surgeries until we identify the cause along with any new precautions to be taken prior to and during surgery.
As a ex-Probation Officer, Soap Box Ravings understands that some incarcerated felons are negatively affected by this. However, they were incarcerated because of their actions and this should be seen as part of their learning experience...for those capable of learning. For those not capable of learning, or those who choose not to learn, they will certainly recycle through the system still believing their problems are someone else's fault.
Soap Box Ravings sends a hearty "Bravo Zulu" to Pennsylvania Governor: Ed Rendell (D)
Pennsylvania Governor Rendell halted paroling state inmates, in response to the killing of Philadelphia Police Officer Patrick McDonald by a paroled felon.
Governor Rendell named John S. Goldkamp, head of Temple University's criminal justice department, to do a top-to-bottom review of how the Board of Probation and Parole decides who gets paroled. The Gov.'s spokesman Chuck Ardo said. "Clearly, the danger posed by an error for a citizen outweighs the impact on the system."
Betty Jean Thompson, of Citizens United for Rehabilitation of Errants (CURE), said she found the wholesale halt to parole illogical: "If a surgeon kills his patient, we don't stop all surgeries."
The complete article can be found at:
http://www.philly.com/inquirer/local/pa/20081013_State_parole_freeze
_bloating_prison_populations.html
Soap Box Ravings says if a surgeon kills his patient perhaps we should stop all of the surgeons surgeries until we identify the cause along with any new precautions to be taken prior to and during surgery.
As a ex-Probation Officer, Soap Box Ravings understands that some incarcerated felons are negatively affected by this. However, they were incarcerated because of their actions and this should be seen as part of their learning experience...for those capable of learning. For those not capable of learning, or those who choose not to learn, they will certainly recycle through the system still believing their problems are someone else's fault.
Soap Box Ravings sends a hearty "Bravo Zulu" to Pennsylvania Governor: Ed Rendell (D)
Monday, October 13, 2008
A Great Idea
Friday, October 10, 2008
Keep A Wary Eye On Your Firearms
On 09/05/08, Christopher Cooper reported from Duryea, PA that during a small political event at SCHOTT North America Inc., a glass factory in Duryea, Pa., where even a hand-picked crowd threw Barack Obama a curve ball.
During the event, a woman told Obama she had “heard a rumor” that he might be planning some sort of gun ban upon being elected president. Obama trotted out his standard policy stance, that he had a deep respect for the “traditions of gun ownership” but favored measures in big cities to keep guns out of the hands of “gang bangers and drug dealers’’ in big cities “who already have them and are shooting people.”
“If you've got a gun in your house, I’m not taking it,’’ Obama said. But the Illinois senator could still see skeptics in the crowd, particularly on the faces of several men at the back of the room.
So he tried again. “Even if I want to take them away, I don’t have the votes in Congress,’’ he said. “This can’t be the reason not to vote for me. Can everyone hear me in the back? I see a couple of sportsmen back there. I’m not going to take away your guns.’’
Soap Box Ravings believes that when you combine his actual statement with his past demonstrated behavior that Barack Hussein Obama will in fact come for your guns if he gets "the votes in Congress." He is backed by many wealthy people who are totally against the private ownership of firearms. The last go around demonized "assault rifles" and assault rifle look alikes regardless of the fact they were not assault rifles. Stand by, if he is elected, he will be after your firearms. Soap Box Ravings says be very wary of anyone who uses the word BUT in their response to anything you have an interest in; regardless of what it is.
Senator "Bill" Nelson and The Democrat Presidential Candidate Senator Barack Obama
This is a response Soap Box Ravings received from Senator Bill Nelson regarding Soap Box Ravings' comments forwarded to the Senator:
Please do not reply to this e-mail. If you need to send another message to Senator Nelson, please use the form on his Web site: http://billnelson.senate.gov/contact/index.cfm#email
Dear Soap Box Ravings:
Thank you for contacting me regarding the Supreme Court ruling in the case of D.C. v. Heller. As you are aware, this ruling upheld a constitutional right to own guns for self-defense and hunting.
In 1976, the District of Columbia's City Council passed legislation that strongly restricted firearms in the District. The law banned all handguns unless they were owned and registered in the District before 1977. The Court's 5-4 ruling on June 26, 2008, struck down the District of Columbia's 32-year-old ban on handguns as incompatible with gun rights under the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
I support the constitutional right to bear arms. I grew up on a ranch in the Florida countryside and have been a hunter since I was a boy. But, I also support efforts to reduce gun violence and promote firearms safety.
I will keep your views in mind whenever the issue of gun control is debated in the Senate. Your communication is important to me and enables me to serve you and the citizens of Florida.
P.S. From time to time, I compile electronic news briefs highlighting key issues and hot topics of particular importance to Floridians. If you'd like to receive these e-briefs, visit my Web site and sign up for them at http://billnelson.senate.gov/news/ebriefs.cfm=
Soap Box Ravings would like for any reader to note the use of the word "but" in the response. Soap Box Ravings spent 30 years in the military plus another 15 years in law enforcement where he handled and was responsible for many types of weapons large and small. Soap Box Ravings has been a qualified small arms instructor for over 25 years with certifications from the US Navy, the State of Florida and the National Rifle Association. Soap Box Ravings will bet a $100 to a donut that Senator Bill Nelson's support of efforts to reduce gun violence and promote firearms safety will be unreasonable and restrictive to firearms ownership.
Senator Mel Martinez
This is a response Soap Box Ravings received from Senator Mel Martinez regarding Soap Box Ravings' comments forwarded to Senator Martinez, the comments forwarded to him were the same comments forwarded to Senator Bill Nelson:
Dear Soap Box Ravings:
Thank you for contacting me regarding gun rights in Washington D.C. I appreciate hearing from you and would like to respond to your concerns.
It is clear to me that when our Founding Fathers drafted the Constitution, they included the Second Amendment to guarantee people the right to keep and bear arms. That right is an individual right that should be afforded the same protection as any other individual right in our Constitution. I can assure you that I will keep your thoughtful comments in mind should any gun control legislation come before the Senate during the 110th Congress.
In 1976, the City Council for District of Columbia passed legislation governing the regulation of handguns within D.C. On June 26, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issued a 5-4 opinion in District of Columbia v. Heller.In Heller the Supreme Court concluded that D.C.'s gun ban is unconstitutional because it requires that any firearms in the home be disassembled or use firearms for the core, lawful purpose of self-defense.
Despite this clear pronouncement from the Supreme Court in Heller,the D.C. government has not yet acted to correct its gun regulations. That is why I have supported H.R. 6842, the National Capital Security and Safety Act, which passed by the House of Representatives on September 17, 2008. This bill, like H.R. 6691 - the bill referenced in your letter - requires the District of Columbia to revise its firearms laws and regulations as necessary to comply with Heller.I hope this legislation will be supported by the Senate and have joined in Senator Hutchison's September 17, 2008 letter to Senator Reid calling for H.R. 6842 to be brought to a vote before the Senate as soon as possible.
Again, thank you for sharing your views with me. If you have any additional questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. In addition, for more information about issues and activities important to Florida, please sign up for my weekly newsletter at http://martinez.senate.gov.
Sincerely,
Mel Martinez
United States Senator
Soap Box Ravings would like the reader to note the absence of the word "but" and commends Senator Martinez for his stance on this matter. Do not get me wrong, Senator Martinez and I are not always in agreement but normally he waffles a lot less than Senator Nelson. Also, the fact that he signed his e-mail makes it seem like he also showed more interest in my concerns.
During the event, a woman told Obama she had “heard a rumor” that he might be planning some sort of gun ban upon being elected president. Obama trotted out his standard policy stance, that he had a deep respect for the “traditions of gun ownership” but favored measures in big cities to keep guns out of the hands of “gang bangers and drug dealers’’ in big cities “who already have them and are shooting people.”
“If you've got a gun in your house, I’m not taking it,’’ Obama said. But the Illinois senator could still see skeptics in the crowd, particularly on the faces of several men at the back of the room.
So he tried again. “Even if I want to take them away, I don’t have the votes in Congress,’’ he said. “This can’t be the reason not to vote for me. Can everyone hear me in the back? I see a couple of sportsmen back there. I’m not going to take away your guns.’’
Soap Box Ravings believes that when you combine his actual statement with his past demonstrated behavior that Barack Hussein Obama will in fact come for your guns if he gets "the votes in Congress." He is backed by many wealthy people who are totally against the private ownership of firearms. The last go around demonized "assault rifles" and assault rifle look alikes regardless of the fact they were not assault rifles. Stand by, if he is elected, he will be after your firearms. Soap Box Ravings says be very wary of anyone who uses the word BUT in their response to anything you have an interest in; regardless of what it is.
Senator "Bill" Nelson and The Democrat Presidential Candidate Senator Barack Obama
This is a response Soap Box Ravings received from Senator Bill Nelson regarding Soap Box Ravings' comments forwarded to the Senator:
Please do not reply to this e-mail. If you need to send another message to Senator Nelson, please use the form on his Web site: http://billnelson.senate.gov/contact/index.cfm#email
Dear Soap Box Ravings:
Thank you for contacting me regarding the Supreme Court ruling in the case of D.C. v. Heller. As you are aware, this ruling upheld a constitutional right to own guns for self-defense and hunting.
In 1976, the District of Columbia's City Council passed legislation that strongly restricted firearms in the District. The law banned all handguns unless they were owned and registered in the District before 1977. The Court's 5-4 ruling on June 26, 2008, struck down the District of Columbia's 32-year-old ban on handguns as incompatible with gun rights under the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
I support the constitutional right to bear arms. I grew up on a ranch in the Florida countryside and have been a hunter since I was a boy. But, I also support efforts to reduce gun violence and promote firearms safety.
I will keep your views in mind whenever the issue of gun control is debated in the Senate. Your communication is important to me and enables me to serve you and the citizens of Florida.
P.S. From time to time, I compile electronic news briefs highlighting key issues and hot topics of particular importance to Floridians. If you'd like to receive these e-briefs, visit my Web site and sign up for them at http://billnelson.senate.gov/news/ebriefs.cfm=
Soap Box Ravings would like for any reader to note the use of the word "but" in the response. Soap Box Ravings spent 30 years in the military plus another 15 years in law enforcement where he handled and was responsible for many types of weapons large and small. Soap Box Ravings has been a qualified small arms instructor for over 25 years with certifications from the US Navy, the State of Florida and the National Rifle Association. Soap Box Ravings will bet a $100 to a donut that Senator Bill Nelson's support of efforts to reduce gun violence and promote firearms safety will be unreasonable and restrictive to firearms ownership.
Senator Mel Martinez
This is a response Soap Box Ravings received from Senator Mel Martinez regarding Soap Box Ravings' comments forwarded to Senator Martinez, the comments forwarded to him were the same comments forwarded to Senator Bill Nelson:
Dear Soap Box Ravings:
Thank you for contacting me regarding gun rights in Washington D.C. I appreciate hearing from you and would like to respond to your concerns.
It is clear to me that when our Founding Fathers drafted the Constitution, they included the Second Amendment to guarantee people the right to keep and bear arms. That right is an individual right that should be afforded the same protection as any other individual right in our Constitution. I can assure you that I will keep your thoughtful comments in mind should any gun control legislation come before the Senate during the 110th Congress.
In 1976, the City Council for District of Columbia passed legislation governing the regulation of handguns within D.C. On June 26, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issued a 5-4 opinion in District of Columbia v. Heller.In Heller the Supreme Court concluded that D.C.'s gun ban is unconstitutional because it requires that any firearms in the home be disassembled or use firearms for the core, lawful purpose of self-defense.
Despite this clear pronouncement from the Supreme Court in Heller,the D.C. government has not yet acted to correct its gun regulations. That is why I have supported H.R. 6842, the National Capital Security and Safety Act, which passed by the House of Representatives on September 17, 2008. This bill, like H.R. 6691 - the bill referenced in your letter - requires the District of Columbia to revise its firearms laws and regulations as necessary to comply with Heller.I hope this legislation will be supported by the Senate and have joined in Senator Hutchison's September 17, 2008 letter to Senator Reid calling for H.R. 6842 to be brought to a vote before the Senate as soon as possible.
Again, thank you for sharing your views with me. If you have any additional questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. In addition, for more information about issues and activities important to Florida, please sign up for my weekly newsletter at http://martinez.senate.gov.
Sincerely,
Mel Martinez
United States Senator
Soap Box Ravings would like the reader to note the absence of the word "but" and commends Senator Martinez for his stance on this matter. Do not get me wrong, Senator Martinez and I are not always in agreement but normally he waffles a lot less than Senator Nelson. Also, the fact that he signed his e-mail makes it seem like he also showed more interest in my concerns.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)